Advanced Shared Hosting vs VPS or Server

[TheJason]

Some shared hosting is known as reseller. It can be resold and also - it has way more bandwidth etc.. than most shared hosting. Anyway, for one of my projects I have chosen it over a VPS - because the VPS offered doesn't have cPanel.

 

[Ghost]

That's a good idea. A dedicated server or VPS is not always needed. The cPanel licenses also can cost around $15/month, so it's not always wise to fire up a new VPS or server for each project. Shared hosting works wonders
You can however set up your own private server with WHM and deploy cPanel accounts easily.

 

[Nerdface]

There seems to be a trend these days toward VPS.. Which definitely has it's advantages, but it's simply not needed for small projects.

Nerdface is on a basic shared hosting package, and is likely to be for quite some time. As additional resources are required, there's other packages I can upgrade to before the need to consider a VPS. It's one way to keep costs down as a hobby..

 

[Tealk]

It depends on the size of the project.
I run a VServer on which I have Froxlor installed and manage my websites.
Of course it would also work without Froxlor.

 

[TheJason]

I think shared hosting - below reseller - is too annoying, even for small projects. Am I in the wrong here?

It depends on the size of the project.
I run a VServer on which I have Froxlor installed and manage my websites.
Of course it would also work without Froxlor.

How?

 

[Tealk]

How?

I don't understand what you want to know.

 

[Malcolm]

I think he could mean: How do you run on VServer perhaps?

 

[Tealk]

I got a server from NetCup (if anyone is interested I have vouchers)
Then you simply follow the wiki https://github.com/Froxlor/Froxlor/wiki
and then you will be guided through the installation in the Froxlor Panel.