Welcome to Code Forum!

Join a community that supports you and your coding journey from day one. We strive to be a friendly, supportive community that empowers everyone to be better developers. By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!

Lets talk about Deepseek

simong1993

Diamond Coder
Staff Team
Guardian
Hey All, so i want to talk about my favourite topic and i one i know @Antero360 loves alot 😀

Deepseek, so as a AI nut trying everything you can think off Deepseek seems to good to be true, i tried it and it seems to be better then GPT but better then Claude now i dont know and with its API being free i mean it could be a game changer, Anyone else tried it before?
 
Hey All, so i want to talk about my favourite topic and i one i know @Antero360 loves alot 😀

Deepseek, so as a AI nut trying everything you can think off Deepseek seems to good to be true, i tried it and it seems to be better then GPT but better then Claude now i dont know and with its API being free i mean it could be a game changer, Anyone else tried it before?
Uhm... how about no. lol
 
Hey All, so i want to talk about my favourite topic and i one i know @Antero360 loves alot 😀

Deepseek, so as a AI nut trying everything you can think off Deepseek seems to good to be true, i tried it and it seems to be better then GPT but better then Claude now i dont know and with its API being free i mean it could be a game changer, Anyone else tried it before?
Yes, DeepSeek is better 🙂 😎 🙂DeepSeek.webpChatGPT.webp
 
Honestly, this AI is mostly written in Python. I think once Rust gets working in AI it will blow this out of the water in performance. Less interpreted, more compiled please. X E.
 
Honestly, this AI is mostly written in Python. I think once Rust gets working in AI it will blow this out of the water in performance. Less interpreted, more compiled please. X E.

using the numbers [15, 36, 55, 7] create an equation that equals 65


Try this on ChatGPT and DeepSeek 🙂Screenshot 2025-02-05 at 07.02.21.webp
Screenshot 2025-02-05 at 08.00.33.webp
Screenshot 2025-02-05 at 07.05.07.webpScreenshot 2025-02-05 at 07.07.20.webp
 
Last edited:
I think for me its more how it handles API responses, can i use it in someway to make money for me GPT always gave me so much rubbish to max the price i pay but with Deepseek the price it dosent matter
 
DeepSeek is cool and proofs size do not always matter, but it is not a real game changer.

It comes down to few very simple things. These are already under development to get better.
- The amount and versality of data we are pushing to LLM's today.​
- The scale of questions and response pair with the context.​
- Bad prompting, this is human factor.​

Amount and versality of data:
- Insane size. One model has data about anything. From knitting to coding, from ancient Egypt to modern day politics and keep on listing. Result is LLM that can do pretty well everything, but is expert in nothing.​
- Well tuned smaller models is the solution. RAG/Agents are the response and those solutions are coming more common.​

The scale of questions and response pair with the context. & Bad prompting, this is human factor.
- AI can create simple pong or tetris just after simple prompt. But thats it.​
- Human cant ask LLM to create full size FPS. LLM runs out of context. And will do so for distant future.​
- Bad prompting; humans tends to believe that everyone knows what just he/she is thinking or wanting.​
​
But LLM's are handy for many tasks. I use them to create all the boring stuff.
"Write index.html for me please.
title = foo bar
Header (w 100%, h 20%), sidebar (left, w 20%, h 100%), main there nicely under header next to sidebar and footer at bottom.
Create index.html and styles.css. Ill adjust them myself more properly."
 

Buy us a coffee!

Buy me a coffee.
Back
Top Bottom